Update 1- Pakistan condemns Quran burning as 'attack on faith' at UN rights body.

Replace 1- Pakistan condemns Quran burning as ‘assault on religion’ at UN rights physique.

(Provides context to paras 2-3, quotes from Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and United Nations Excessive Commissioner for Human Rights from para 5)

Geneva, July 11, 2010: Pakistan’s international minister mentioned on Tuesday that desecration of the Qur’an is inciting non secular hatred after the UN Human Rights Council made a controversial movement final month when the Koran was burned in Sweden.

Pakistan’s request for a response to the disaster in Sweden requires a UN rights chief to submit a report on the subject, asking them to overview their legal guidelines and plug loopholes that “impede the prevention and prosecution of acts of spiritual hatred.”

It highlighted the rift between the West and Muslim factions on the United Nations, with Western members involved in regards to the implications for freedom of speech and longstanding challenges to human rights protections.

An Iraqi immigrated to Sweden final month burned a Koran outdoors a Stockholm mosque, sparking outrage within the Muslim world and protests in a number of Pakistani cities.

Pakistan’s Overseas Minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari informed the council by way of video hyperlink: “We should clearly see this as incitement to spiritual hatred, discrimination and violence.” A sense of innocence”.

He added, “There’s a want to know the intense hurt precipitated to Muslims by public and deliberate humiliation of the Qur’an. That is an assault on their religion.”

Saudi Arabia’s Overseas Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan condemned the Swedish incident.

UN human rights chief Volker Turk informed the 47-member council that inciting assaults in opposition to Muslims and different non secular or minority teams had been “offensive, irresponsible and improper”.

Nonetheless, as these are “advanced areas”, warning should be exercised in opposition to the potential of abuse by these in energy by imposing authorized restrictions on free speech.

(Reporting by Emma Farge and Gabrielle Tetrault-Farber; Modifying by Emma Rumney)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Shopping Cart